TWO STICKS: REFUTING THE MORMON VIEW OF EZEKIEL 37:15-17

By on Aug 25, 2010 in AM Missives, Current Issues, Features

The word of the Lord came to me: “Son of man, take a stick and write on it, ‘For Judah, and the people of Israel associated with him’; then take another stick and write on it, ‘For Joseph (the stick of Ephraim) and all the house of Israel associated with him.’ And join them one to another into one stick, that they may become one in your hand.” (Ezekiel 37:15-17)

 Looking Carefully At What This Ezekiel Passsage Actually Says

Is this passage of the Bible actually referring to The Book of Mormon; well, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (the Mormons) would have us think so: 

Many Mormons insist that the sticks mentioned in the foregoing verses actually speak of books. One of the books, they insist, is the Bible, while the other is the Book of Mormon.

One Mormon leader who championed this notion was LDS Apostle LeGrand Richards. On page 67 of his book A Marvelous Work and A Wonder, he quotes Ezekiel 37:15-20 and concludes, “In ancient times it was the custom to write on parchment and roll it on a stick. Therfore, when this command was given, it was the equivalent of directing that two books or records should be kept.” (Online source)

The Hebrew word used by Ezekiel is ets, which means “wood, tree, stick”; translated in this passage as stick,  ets is also used in Numbers 15:32; 1 Kings 17:10; 2 Kings 6:6, and Lamentations 4:8, to name a few places. Had God meant “scroll” or “book” here in Ezekiel He would have used the word cepher, which appears in Joshua 1:8; Isaiah 30:8; Jeremiah 36:2; Daniel 12:1, and Malachi 3:16 to cite a few examples. And Ezekiel himself uses this very word in chapter 2, verse 9 of his book, so obviouly we know he was aware of it and therefore could have used it here in chapter 37; if God had wanted him to. 

It needs to be understood here that these Hebrew words are not used interchangeably in Scripture. In hermeneutics—the science of biblical interpretation—it is always proper to understand a passage of Scripture in its full context, and to interpret it in the plainest sense. In other words, using the historical-grammatical method we need to attempt to see how the people who received the original document in the historical setting would have understood it. 

The context of a passage, and the definitions of words must be as they were at the time the text was written for it to be understood correctly. People need to be careful not to “interpret” the Bible in an attempt to make it say what they want it to say so as to advance their own teachings. To correctly approach this passage from Ezekiel one must remember, that just as the English language has different words for a book or a stick, so also does the Hebrew. And this would be true for most known languages as well. 

Following the biblical admonition to let everything be confirmed by 2 or 3 witnesses, let’s look at just a couple of many times the word ets appears in the Bible. For example:

And she said, “As the Lord your God lives, I have nothing baked, only a handful of flour in a jar and a little oil in a jug. And now I am gathering a couple of sticks that I may go in and prepare it for myself and my son, that we may eat it and die.” (1 Kings 17:12)  

We must ask ourselves, in this passage Holy Scripture, is the widow gathering scrolls or books? How about the following:

Then the man of God said, “Where did it fall?” When he showed him the place, he cut off a stick and threw it in there and made the iron float. (2 Kings 6:6)   

Did Elisha cut down a book or a scroll and then throw it into the water? The obvious answer to both of these questions is no. So then, it would only make sense to understand this passage of Scripture in Ezekiel 37 to simply mean sticks as well, because this same Hebrew word ets is used in each case. 

The logical conclusion is that Ezekiel 37:15-17 is to be understood literally. The Lord told Ezekiel to take one stick and carve on it, “For Judah”, etc. Then to take another stick and carve into it, “For Joseph”, etc. This was all Ezeliel was to write on these sticks and then join them together; it’s not at all referring in any way to The Book of Mormon. 

Now God may have done a miracle and supernaturally joined the sticks as one, or Ezekiel may have simply held them together in his hand. The two sticks were to be used as a visual aid for the people Ezekiel would later be addressing. This portion of the Bible is about the Lord declaring that Judah and Israel, the two houses of His people divided since the reign of King Rehoboam, would be brought together as one nation with one king again. The literal historical context of this Scripture becomes clear by reading through to verse 22, as this whole chapter is dealing with the restoration of Israel to her own land. 

As we close this out, concerning Ezekiel 37:17, renowned Bible scholar Matthew Henry writes in his classic Commentary: 

This emblem was to show the people, that the Lord would unite Judah and Israel. Christ is the true David, Israel’s King of old; and those whom he makes willing in the day of his power, he makes to walk in his judgments, and to keep his statutes. (Online source)

The Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary correctly informs us that the sticks in this passage of Ezekiel is:

alluding to Nu 17:2, the tribal rod. The union of the two rods was a prophecy in action of the brotherly union which is to reunite the ten tribes and Judah. As their severance under Jeroboam was fraught with the greatest evil to the covenant-people, so the first result of both being joined by the spirit of life to God is that they become joined to one another under the one covenant King, Messiah-David. (Online source)

For these reasons, the Christian Church—along with orthodox Judaism—because of the actual historical evidence, has long considered that this passage of Ezekiel, is literally referring to sticks of wood. Following the incontrovertible laws of linguistics, combined with all this historical evidence, the case is much too strong for the assertions of the Mormon Church to stand. 

Bill McKeever of the fine Mormonism Research Ministry sums up our thesis quite well when he says: 

Of course, the widow of Zarephath was not gathering books, any more than Elisha cut down a book from a tree. Neither was Ezekiel holding books (or scrolls) in his hand as Mormons all too often imply. 

Ezekiel 37 has nothing to say about the Book of Mormon. By using two literal sticks, Ezekiel was illustratively predicting the coming together of two nations, Judah and Israel, which had been separated since the time of King Rehoboam, nothing more. If the Mormon would continue reading to verse 22, he would see that this is clearly explained. (Online source) 

And in the end, the reason that the historic, orthodox, Christian Church has always rejected the LDS view that this passage of Holy Scripture foretells the coming of The Book Of Mormon is that it feels a proper hermeneutic compels the reader to understand these words of Ezekiel literally. 

See also:

WHY GLENN BECK WANTS TO SAVE AMERICA

MORMON CHURCH: DEITY OF CHRIST

MORMON CHURCH: JESUS LITERALLY GOD’S CHILD

THE MORMON CHURCH’S VIEW OF THE BIBLE

CONTRADICTIONS IN MORMON “SCRIPTURES”

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS VS. THE GOSPEL

JOHN MACARTHUR: NO SPIRITUAL COMMON GROUND BETWEEN BIBLICAL CHRISTIANITY AND MORMONISM